Oh, MG
Subscribe
Cover photo

My Favorite Things of 2021: Part 2

On “Succession,” Jeremy Strong has given one of the most extraordinary and compelling acting performances of his generation.

Malcolm Gladwell

Dec 27, 2021
1
21

The Part Two of my “Best of 2021” is really just a rant. And why not? This column has been remarkably civil so far.

The rant stems from the last of my “Best of” questions: What was the best television show of 2021?

I’m not going to blow any minds here. My choice is the same as everyone else’s: HBO’s Succession. I have my quibbles with the show, and particularly this season, which was a little slower than previous seasons. I wish they’d mixed things up more. I wish they’d killed someone off. I wish every second word out of every character’s mouth wasn’t “fuck.” But, as I said, these are quibbles. If you haven’t watched it, you have a tremendous treat awaiting you.

So what’s my rant? Well, it has to do with a profile that ran in the New Yorker magazine of one of the show’s stars, Jeremy Strong. Strong plays the character Kendall Roy, son of Logan Roy, the patriarch around whom the show revolves. The article was by Michael Schulman. I should say, before I go any further, that I am both a huge fan of the New Yorker (where I worked for many years) and of Michael Schulman. He’s written some wonderful pieces on Meryl Streep and Michael Shannon, among others. So please keep that in mind.

The profile is generous, in part. But it tries very hard to make you dislike Jeremy Strong. Schulman quotes people who have worked with Strong saying that they find him insufferable. He paints Strong as a climber, a relentless networker, a man of overweening self-seriousness and more than a little ridiculous.

There are lots of passages like this:

Or this, about a movie where Strong played someone with autism:

Or this:

There is a particularly brutal scene where Schulman meets up with Strong in Copenhagen, and Strong leads the two of them on a late-night search first for the best burger in Copenhagen. And, when that quest comes to naught, Strong insists on an equally fruitless search for the second-best burger in Copenhagen. Writers of profiles include those kinds of everyday life set pieces for a reason: they want to make their subjects look a little ridiculous.

I have several thoughts about this. First, ever since I joined the workforce (many many years ago!) I’ve noticed that bosses and coworkers love to attach the label of “difficult” to certain kinds of employees. But it has also struck me that that term has two very different meanings. First, there are people I would call instrumentally difficult: that is to say, people who take what they do so seriously and are so driven to perfection that they impose burdens on others. Second, there are the malignantly difficult: people who impose burdens on others because they are needlessly or maliciously or flagrantly annoying. The burdens on managers and co-workers in both cases can feel the same. But the roots and consequences of each kind of difficulty could not be more different.

In my first big job at the Washington Post, many years ago, I worked with a reporter named Mike Isikoff. Mike—as I think even he would admit—was difficult! But he was instrumentally difficult. He was passionate and perfectionististic and demanding in the course of doing his work, and those characteristics were a big part of the reason that he is—hands down—one of the greatest investigative reporters of his generation. Mike was not malignant. He was, in fact, hilarious and charming. We shared an editor in those early years, a wonderful man named Frank Swoboda. It would fall to Frank to defend Mike before other Washington Post editors who found Mike difficult, and Frank would always make a version of this argument: A newspaper is in the business of breaking news. It is our job as editors to put up with whatever occasional inconveniences or burdens our reporters impose on us in the pursuit of this goal. (“If being difficult was a crime,” Frank once told me, when I was being difficult, “we’d all be in jail.”) There were plenty of other reporters at the Post in those years who were a delight to be around… and who never broke a story in their lives. We can privilege instrumental ease over instrumental difficulty, but before long we won’t have a newspaper anymore.

So what is Jeremy Strong? He’s not malignantly difficult. Nothing unearthed by Schulman suggests that Strong is anything other than a thoughtful and kind and conscientious person. He’s instrumentally difficult. And if you take on the task of finding the “real in the make-believe” as seriously as Strong does, you will unavoidably impose burdens on others.

Remember that quote from someone on the design team that they had “bigger things to deal with” than give Strong the personalized props he wanted? What? It wasn’t like he was pouting in his trailer, or four hours late to the set, or strung out on drugs. He was trying to do his job better. And if you work on a movie set, and you have bigger things to do than help the star of the movie do his job better, you should look for another career.

Then there is this section:

Strong is correct, of course. As anyone who has watched more than five minutes of Succession knows, his character would never eat a Waldorf salad. And that error threw Jeremy Strong off his game. He wanted to be Kendall Roy, and he couldn’t be Kendall Roy if he was forced to do something that Kendall Roy wouldn’t do. On Succession, Jeremy Strong has given one of the most extraordinary and compelling acting performances of his generation. Are we seriously going to let the hassle of switching out $9 appetizers get in the way of that?

I wish Michael Schulman had made this argument. The endless litany of anonymous quotes that Schulman assembles from people sniping about how difficult Jeremy Strong is would have made a lot more sense if he had pointed out that sometimes putting up with a little instrumental difficulty is just the price you pay for art.

Give the man his salad.

[Photo: David Crotty / Contributor via Getty Images]

Subscribe for free to Oh, MGMalcolm Gladwell answers your burning questions... and his own.
By subscribing, you agree to share your email address with Malcolm Gladwell to receive their original content, including promotions. Unsubscribe at any time. Meta will also use your information subject to the Bulletin Terms and Policies
1
21

More from Oh, MG
See all

Tucker Carlson Is a Sideshow

It’s entirely possible that Carlson influenced the Buffalo shooter. But we might be overstating the Fox News host’s reach.
May 17
38
63

The Magic of Revisionist History “Table Reads” Is Coming to the Live Stage

This is the first live show of this kind we’ve ever done, and I wanted to explain why we’re doing it.
Apr 30
5
3

The Canadian Soccer Team Argument For Open Borders

In the 1970s and '80s, Canada let in lots of immigrants, many of whom happened to be from countries that care a lot about soccer.
Apr 27
10
31
Comments
Log in with Facebook to comment

21 Comments

  • Cynthia Weinmann
    And I'm so glad that I can make an argument with folks who call me difficult and suggest that my own swim lane might be a good place for me to stay underwater. As opposed, that is, to pestering them over writing that includes things like "a vast staffi…
    See more
    • 20w
  • Hanlu Lyman
    Once again your post has made my day. Thank you Malcolm for writing about this. I too had every urge to rent when I heard all the chatters about the New Yorker profile. I couldn’t get it out of my head. In addition to all the effort of making Strong lo…
    See more
    • 20w
    • Edited
  • Michelle Ross Daniels
    I’m so glad you redeemed Michael Schulman because he revealed so much about himself in this profile that I greatly resented the intrusion. I wonder, though, if his intent was to help the reader separate Jeremy Strong from his difficult-to-like characte…
    See more
    • 20w
  • Matthew Zullo
    It sounds like Strong is both intrinsically difficult and malignantly difficult. It's always a balance of how much one can benefit from intrinsic moments verses the disruptions and narcissism of the malignant moments.
    • 20w
    1 Reply
  • Alina DuClos
    I liked this piece. I am so happy someone is standing up to troll journalism. What slays me is the fact that no one really knows everything that goes on in their own life, yet people find it so easy to condemn someone they know even less about, over …
    See more
    • 20w
  • James Flint
    I'm so glad I signed up for 'Oh, MG.' I knew I liked you writing, but I had forgot how much. After a season of "Game of Thrones" some years ago, I became leery of getting sucked in to any series good enough to hook you, but not really good enough to …
    See more
    • 20w
  • Aaron Snook
    I’ve been thinking a lot about this. For context, I’ve been a theatre artist most of my life, now teach acting. have an MFA in directing from Northwestern, and used to revere “method actors.” There is a ton to say, but I’ll keep it short. Strong is …
    See more
    • 17w
  • Paul Pineiro
    I saw Jeremey Strong in a challenging situation filming the DC episode in Season two (Senate hearings). As "background actors" (extras), we are not to make eye contact or engage with the talent unless they do so first. So I was standing offset with an…
    See more
    • 20w
    • Edited
  • Sarah Downes
    So, another great post, but one that I'm afraid I am going to have to push back on slightly. 'If you work on a movie set and you have bigger things to do than help the star of the movie do his job better you should look for another career'. Oh, MG. L…
    See more
    • 20w
  • Alicia P Cashperson
    I'm just starting to read your article. I'm not done but thrilled that you are bringing intellectual thought to FB which is filled with an enormous lack of curiosity. Just teasingthree comments I can see your audience is smart and informed. Thank you!
    • 19w
View 10 more comments
Share quoteSelect how you’d like to share below
Share on Facebook
Share to Twitter
Send in Whatsapp
Share on Linkedin
Privacy  ·  Terms  ·  Cookies  ·  © Meta 2022
Discover fresh voices. Tune into new conversations. Browse all publications