Oh, MG
Subscribe
Cover photo

What I’d Change In “Revisionist History” If I Could Go Back In Time

…and other answers to your questions.

Malcolm Gladwell

Feb 27
1
16

Hey everyone. It’s mailbag time!

The cynic in me has always thought that writers resort to “mailbags”—answering questions from readers—when they’ve run out of ideas. In my case, I swear: This is not true! I have a zillion ideas. The reason to do a mailbag is to discover what you, the readers and podcast listeners, care about. Believe it or not, that’s the one thing that a writer rarely knows.

For example, when I wrote Outliers, I thought the 10,000 hours chapter was the least interesting part of the book. But then the book came out and for a time that’s all people wanted to talk about. I was wandering off in one direction, my readers were wandering in another. How do you solve that problem? With a mailbag! So here goes.

“If you could redo one of the episodes of Revisionist History, which one would it be and why?” (@hellocarolinita)

Interesting question! I think, in general, that Revisionist History episodes fail when I try to do too much—that is, when I lose faith in the power of the main story I’m telling and feel the need to jazz things up with lots of extraneous digressions.

Case in point, from Season 1: I did an episode called “Generous Orthodoxy” about a Mennonite pastor named Chester Wenger, who chose to perform the marriage ceremony for his gay son and, as a result, was stripped of his position by his church. It’s an incredibly powerful story. Wenger was, at the time, nearly 100 years old and as impressive a person as I have ever met: a true man of God, only built like a linebacker. The episode ends with Wenger in his tiny living room in Lancaster County, PA, weeping. (And all of us in the room weeping alongside him.) The point of the episode was to demonstrate how to disagree gracefully with an institution that you love. The line from the piece that summed it up was: “You must respect the body that you are trying to heal.”

But then, smack in the middle of the episode, I go on a strange, pointless digression about the protests at Princeton University over the fact that their public policy school was named after Woodrow Wilson. I suppose on some level the two stories are linked. But if you listen to that episode, you will ask yourself—why did Malcolm mess up a quiet and beautiful story about a man’s love for his son and his church with a sidebar about students screaming at their dean. And the answer is—Malcolm made a mistake! He didn’t trust his A Story and thought he needed a B Story.

This is, by the way, a criticism that can reliably be made of lots of my writing and podcasts. I get nervous! I think my idea isn’t good enough and needs the bells and whistles of a B Story.

As proof that I’m getting better, though, let me point you to the final episode of last season of Revisionist History: “The Dog Will See You Now.” It’s one of my favorite episodes ever—not because it is the most original or the most brilliant or the most moving, but because I resisted the impulse to add an extraneous B Story. Well done Malcolm! :)

“Is there one event/person/thing that sparked your inquisitive mind and keeps you forever in that sense of wonder?” — (Emily M.)

That’s a super hard question! Several people asked questions similar to this one, so I want to take a stab at it.

My dad has been on my mind a lot recently, since we are coming up on the fifth anniversary of his death, so let me credit him. Here’s a little bit of what I said about him in his obituary:

The key sentences are the first two. My dad had a very clearly delineated sense of his own expertise. And if any conversation wasn’t operating in the areas where he excelled, he preferred to listen and ask questions. Some of my most important memories as a child are of watching him—a man whom I thought was omniscient—admit his ignorance and open himself up to learning something new from someone else. My father had a Ph.D. in Mathematics and our neighbor was a farmer who hadn’t gone beyond the 6th grade, but my father learned a mountain of things from our neighbor. I like to think that when I’m at my best and my happiest, I’m just trying to be more like my Dad. I think about him everyday. He is greatly missed.

Here’s a bit more from the obituary:

“What's your favourite example of rule-breaking in sport?” (@mrianleslie)

The Berkoff blastoff!

Some of you may remember this from the 1988 Olympics in Seoul. One of the leading American swimmers that year was the backstroker David Berkoff. That season, he repeatedly broke the world record by doing something almost unheard of: At the start of the 100-meter backstroke, he swam underwater for 35 to 40 meters, using what’s known as a dolphin kick. (I’m no swimmer. All I can say is that the best way to describe a dolphin kick is that it looks like a cross between a tadpole and a belly-dancer. Very elaborate.)

The idea that it might be faster to swim under the water rather than on top of it had been tried, tentatively, before. But the general feeling was that holding your breath for that long would put in such oxygen debt that you would pay dearly for your choice at the end of the race. Berkoff’s big innovation? Proving that wasn’t true!

Why is this rule-breaking? Because Berkoff set the world record on a race held above the water by swimming underwater, and set the world record in the backstroke by not swimming the backstroke. I mean. How can we not love this guy?!

Of course, you know how this ends. The world swimming authority cracked down and limited underwater starts to 15 meters. As we have learned again and again, the world does not love a rule-breaker.

“What would happen with the sea slug's soul when the slug is decapitated but the body still lives with the heart beating for some days while the head regenerates another body? Would the soul be splitted into two parts or would it choose just the head?”

My favorite mailbags ever were the ones that Bill Simmons used to do every Friday when he had his sports column on the ESPN website. (As Bill likes to say, that was back when his “fingers still worked.”) He ended every mailbag the same way. He picked out a particularly hilarious or odd or just plain bonkers question and then said, without further elaboration: “Yes. These are my readers.”

As it turns out, these are my readers.

Subscribe for free to Oh, MG
By subscribing, you agree to share your email address with Malcolm Gladwell to receive their original content, including promotions. Unsubscribe at any time. Meta will also use your information subject to the Bulletin Terms and Policies
1
16

More from Oh, MG
See all

Tucker Carlson Is a Sideshow

It’s entirely possible that Carlson influenced the Buffalo shooter. But we might be overstating the Fox News host’s reach.
May 17
41
64

The Magic of Revisionist History “Table Reads” Is Coming to the Live Stage

This is the first live show of this kind we’ve ever done, and I wanted to explain why we’re doing it.
Apr 30
5
3

The Canadian Soccer Team Argument For Open Borders

In the 1970s and '80s, Canada let in lots of immigrants, many of whom happened to be from countries that care a lot about soccer.
Apr 27
10
31
Comments
Log in with Facebook to comment

16 Comments

  • Rachel Ramos
    huge fan of ALL your books but still need to get into the podcast groove. i fear that podcasts will never get my full attention unlike sitting down and reading a book (conversely, you did admit going off tangent - such is the nature of "live" conversat…
    See more
    • 8w
  • Susan Sparkman
    Bravo!
    Great reporting Malcolm!
    As a grad from Harvard, Boston College and Texas A&M University, I know the rankings definitely impact student decisions. I’m definitely paying for those rankings for my daughter’s grad school program at Georgetown, on …
    See more
    • 9w
  • Bradman Wunster
    No failure in "Mennonite pastor". It took me some time, but realized you were contrasting the way of love -vs- the way of our human strength. Great idea, actually. I'm going thru all your podcasts, having only recently discovered them. To Wit: "Free Br…
    See more
    • 11w
  • Eleanor Millwood
    Malcolm I love your newsletter and I sorely miss the original Revisionist History where you took us on sublime journeys of discovery wrapped in the most beautiful prose and the soothing sound of your baritone. Please give us Season 7 as soon as possibl…
    See more
    • 11w
  • Susan Bergin
    Mr. Gladwell,
    It has taken my awhile to connect with your blog but for the last five years I have read your books again and again and cherish your blog. My considerable respect and heartfelt feelings about your sharing your fathers characteristics and …
    See more
    • 10w
  • Deborah Collins-Rapp
    Malcolm, Have you read the book The Laws of Human Behavior? And how did it make you feel? I am only halfway thru listening to the 28 hours(!!!) and it's scarey.... Is it just me? I feel like my innocence was stolen, i went from being an amateur "stud…
    See more
    • 11w
    • Edited
  • Phil Jensen
    Hi Malcolm. I recently read Bomber Mafia (right after I read Strangers) and was intrigued by what I thought was a deliberate and intentional omission, however I'm not sure this is the forum to ask about it. To be clear, it's just a question, I still lo…
    See more
    • 11w
  • Chris Fehr
    I have to agree with your response about tangents. Keep in mind I’m either driving or should be thinking about work while listening so you never have my full attention.
    • 10w
  • John Horner
    Hi Malcolm - Thank you for Revisionist History! It is my favorite podcast (by a wide margin) and it has, literally, been life changing for me. I discovered RH about a year ago and simply can’t get enough. Carlos Doesn’t Remember Food Fight and My L…
    See more
    • 11w
  • Phil Hooper
    I happen to like the use of the Princeton digression in Generous Orthodoxy as a juxtaposition to Chester Wenger's way of respecting the institution he's trying to heal. I remember thinking that the Princeton protesters could have benefited from learnin…
    See more
    • 7w
View 6 more comments
Share quoteSelect how you’d like to share below
Share on Facebook
Share to Twitter
Send in Whatsapp
Share on Linkedin
Privacy  ·  Terms  ·  Cookies  ·  © Meta 2022
Discover fresh voices. Tune into new conversations. Browse all publications